ePIC

Comparison of Predicted and Measured Bathymetry

Edit Item Edit Item

General Information:

Citation:
Krocker, R. and Schenke, H. W. (2006): Comparison of Predicted and Measured Bathymetry , Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 92 (1), pp. 159-161 .
Cite this page as:
Contact Email:
Download:

Supplementary Information:

Abstract:

Acoustic multibeam measurements and satellite predictions are often considered to be competing methods to detect seafloor topography. In opposition to that the supplementing aspects will be pointed out to aim at geophysical interpretations. Advantages and limits of the indirect method will be briefly explained starting with the correlation of sea surface heights and sea floor topography to derive gravity anomalies. In the next step the method of forward modelling will be explained. Finally, differences are shown comparing predicted and measured bathymetry of the Eltanin Impact Area, South Pacific, as well as predicted gravity and measured bathymetry of the Weddell Sea.

Further Details:

Imprint
AWI
Policies:
read more
OAI 2.0:
http://epic.awi.de/cgi/oai2
ePIC is powered by:
EPrints 3