Centralised Labour Market Negotiations: Strategic Behaviour Curbs Employment


Contact
thorsten.upmann [ at ] hifmb.de

Abstract

This paper contributes to the analysis of centralised versus decentralised labour market negotiations. Applying the familiar Nash bargaining solution, we show that centralised negotiations lead to a lower employment level but to a higher wage rate than decentralised labour market bargaining. While this is an important theoretical result on its own, it has important effects for both empirical labour market research and labour market policies. Also, this result counters the critique that efficient negotiations result in employment levels exceeding the competitive level.



Item Type
Article
Authors
Divisions
Primary Division
Programs
Primary Topic
Publication Status
Published
Eprint ID
58086
DOI 10.1628/093245617x14930170168706

Cite as
Müller, J. and Upmann, T. (2018): Centralised Labour Market Negotiations: Strategic Behaviour Curbs Employment , Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics JITE, 174 (2), p. 278 . doi: 10.1628/093245617x14930170168706


Share
Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email


Citation


Actions
Edit Item Edit Item