Reply to ‘Dissimilarity measures affected by richness differences yield biased delimitations of biogeographic realms’


Contact
chhaya.chaudhary [ at ] awi.de

Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Recently, we classified the oceans into 30 biogeographic realms based on species’ endemicity. Castro-Insua et al. criticize the choices of dissimilarity coefficients and clustering approaches used in our paper, and reanalyse the data using alternative techniques. Here, we explain how the approaches used in our original paper yield results in line with existing biogeographical knowledge and are robust to alternative methods of analysis. We also repeat the analysis using several similarity coefficients and clustering algorithms, and a neural network theory method. Although each combination of methods produces outputs differing in detail, the overall pattern of realms is similar. The coarse nature of the present boundaries of the realms reflects the limited field data but may be improved with additional data and mapping to environmental variables.</jats:p>



Item Type
Article
Authors
Divisions
Primary Division
Primary Topic
Publication Status
Published
Eprint ID
59083
DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-07252-4

Cite as
Costello, M. J. , Tsai, P. , Cheung, A. K. L. , Basher, Z. and Chaudhary, C. (2018): Reply to ‘Dissimilarity measures affected by richness differences yield biased delimitations of biogeographic realms’ , Nature Communications, 9 (1), p. 5085 . doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07252-4


Download
[thumbnail of Reply to Dissimilarity measures affected by richness differences yield biased delimitations of biogeographic realms.pdf]
Preview
PDF
Reply to Dissimilarity measures affected by richness differences yield biased delimitations of biogeographic realms.pdf - Other

Download (2MB) | Preview

Share
Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email


Citation


Actions
Edit Item Edit Item